Sunday, July 14

Researcher warns that Genetically modified babies to create ‘SUPERHUMANS with upgraded brains’

In November 2018, Chinese researcher He Jiankui reported that he had utilized a ground-breaking gene editing tool known as CRISPR to “genetically modify” two infants. Dr Jiankui, close by his group, evacuated a gene known as CCR5 to make the infants resistant to HIV, smallpox and cholera. The news sparked a global outcry, with many questioning the moral and ethical decisions behind the experiment.

Presently scientific community has asserted the two youngsters, who are twins, could create upgraded brains.

They state recent research on mice demonstrated that, while the gene blocks the advancement of AIDS, it additionally made them more keen than their peers.

Alcino J. Silva, a neurobiologist at the University of California, told the MIT Technology Review a week ago: “The answer is likely yes, it will affect their brains.

“The simplest interpretation is that those mutations will probably have an impact on the cognitive function in the twins.

“Could it be conceivable that at one point in the future we could increase the average IQ of the population? I would not be a scientist if I said no.”

Dr Silva proceeded to uncover that, while look into on mice has given researchers a superior thought of the effect, it is as yet uncertain.

He proceeded with: “The work on mice demonstrates the answer may be yes – but mice are not people.

“We simply don’t know what the consequences will be in mucking around with humans.

“We are not ready for it yet.”

Disfavored researcher Dr Jiankui, who has been named “China’s Dr Frankenstein”, was sacked from his job at the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen following the experiment.

He was purportedly held under house capture at the university while he was researched.

Experts said he had sorted out a group to “intentionally avoid surveillance and use technology with uncertain safety and effectiveness” to pursue his experiment.

They additionally blamed him for doing as such “in pursuit of personal fame and fortune”.

He apparently forged ethical review papers during the time spent his trial, which included recruiting eight couples, bringing about two pregnancies.

Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No A News Week journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.